tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-855858170324181302.post3218649508751323462..comments2023-10-18T07:54:08.229-07:00Comments on Ranting and Raving: Rant #1,006: Cover BoyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-855858170324181302.post-39907421678636717572013-07-19T04:04:41.196-07:002013-07-19T04:04:41.196-07:00I agree, but you have to admit, it is controversia...I agree, but you have to admit, it is controversial. Rolling Stone really doesn't know what type of magazine it is now, and the same corporations that the magazine was created to rant and rave about are now in bed with it. Those corporations advertised in the magazine, so they aren't upset about this, and yes, they are in the business to sell magazines, just like Sports Illustrated is in the business to sell magazines, and did so with its Kate Upton cover. I was more speaking about Rolling Stone's lost way than about what they do to sell magazines.Larryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13163421362475667551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-855858170324181302.post-24158481101188273732013-07-18T06:31:22.673-07:002013-07-18T06:31:22.673-07:00I don't see anything wrong with Tsarnaev being...I don't see anything wrong with Tsarnaev being the cover story.<br />Rolling Stone is in the business to sell magazines.<br />All the publicity this cover is getting is exactly what they love.<br />They have had Charles Manson on the cover in 1970.<br />It's a self portrait they haven't paid him for a cover shoot.<br />All The Best,<br />-SamAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02253575381581249338noreply@blogger.com